Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40083403›Full record

ArticleMycology2025

Eleven new species of

Rui Zhao, Ke-Yu Chen, Li-Juan Mao, Chu-Long Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mycology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Efficacy of a biofungicide based onFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Four Unrecorded Species ofMycobiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Integrative Taxonomy Reveals Two NewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Assessing the Impact of a NovelJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Identification ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  16. Mycology · 2025
    Article
  17. Four new species ofMycoKeys · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rui ZhaoMinistry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects, Key Laboratory of Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects of Zhejiang Province, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Ke-Yu ChenMinistry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects, Key Laboratory of Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects of Zhejiang Province, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Li-Juan MaoAnalysis Center of Agrobiology and Environmental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Chu-Long ZhangMinistry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects, Key Laboratory of Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects of Zhejiang Province, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Hypocrealesnew speciesphylogenetic analysistaxonomyTrichoderma

Identifiers

PMID40083403
PMCPMC11899217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.