ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2025
Assessment of photodynamic therapy efficacy against
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phagocyte NADPH Oxidase NOX2-Derived Reactive Oxygen Species in Antimicrobial Defense: Mechanisms, Regulation, and Therapeutic Potential-A Narrative Review.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Integrating optical coherence tomography and bioluminescence with predictive modeling for quantitative assessment of methicillin-resistantJournal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significance: In orthopedic trauma surgery, spatially structured biofilm ecosystems of bacteria that colonize orthopedic devices account for up to 65% of all healthcare infections, including tens of millions of people affected in the United States. These biofilm infections typically show increased resistance to antibiotics due to their structure and composition, which contributes significantly to treatment failure. Anti-biofilm approaches are needed together with clinically usable microscopic-resolution imaging techniques for treatment efficacy assessment. Aim: Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) has been recently proposed to combat clinically relevant biofilms (chronic wound infections, dental biofilms, etc.) using photosensitizers excited with visible light to generate reactive oxygen species that can kill bacteria residing within pathogenic biofilms. We aim to assess the efficacy of this treatment for eradication of biofilms typically present on surfaces of orthopedic devices (e.g., intramedullary nails and osseointegrated prosthetic implants). Approach: In the first phase reported here, we test aPDT Results: The antibacterial efficiency of 5-ALA-based aPDT showed nonlinear dependence on the photosensitizer concentration and the light power density, with low parameters ( Conclusions: Performed experiments enable the translation of this portable treatment/imaging platform to the second phase of the study: aPDT treatment response assessment of biofilms grown on orthopedic hardware.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.