Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40083344›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Pedagogical strategies for supporting learning and student well-being in environmentally sustainable healthcare.

Nara Jones, Graeme Horton, Michelle Guppy, Georgia Brown, John Boulton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nara JonesSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Graeme HortonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Michelle GuppySchool of Rural Medicine, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
Georgia BrownSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
John BoultonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Planetary health education needs fresh approaches to engage learners and educators in positive visions and future planning to navigate the societal challenges of climate change. The human health impacts of the climate crisis, environmental degradation and pollution are far-reaching and compounding in nature. International leaders in healthcare are recognizing the time-pressured opportunity to mobilize and motivate colleagues to optimize health outcomes by addressing these issues. Healthcare systems across the globe contribute significantly to ecological footprints through greenhouse gas emissions and consumption of various polluting materials. Therefore, the necessity to prepare future health professionals to identify and manage environmental health conditions in their patients, as well as foster their future role as leaders and advocates in sustainable healthcare is acute. Health education organizations have begun to appreciate this need and have developed learning objectives to guide curricula. In the development and implementation of content on environmentally sustainable healthcare, an important consideration is the affective and moral distress from the confronting and often overwhelming nature of the topic. The main objective in teaching planetary health is to equip learners with the tools and skills to address the relevant health issues in their professional role whilst providing the support necessary for them to accept these harsh realities. The University of Newcastle and University of New England Joint Medical Program's, four-week course in Sustainable Healthcare aims to meet this objective. In this article we discuss how our curriculum utilizes Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and other psychological strategies to support learners' well-being and motivation. SDT explains the need for supporting autonomy, relatedness and competence in the learning environment. Strategies employed to address these include providing students with the opportunity to select discussion topics that they contribute to, maximizing choice of focus for the assessment task, utilizing personal reflections, case-based learning scenarios and incorporating presentations from relatable industry leaders.

Indexed as

educational theoryhealth professional educationplanetary healthstudent well-beingsustainable healthcare

Identifiers

PMID40083344
PMCPMC11903470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.