Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40083340›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Social participation patterns and associations with subsequent cognitive function in older adults with cognitive impairment: a latent class analysis.

Xin Li, Haishan Feng, Qingling Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xin LiZhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Haishan FengZhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Qingling ChenZhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Social participation (SP) has been associated with cognitive benefits among older adults; however, little is known about SP patterns and their relationships with cognitive function in cognitively impaired populations. This study aimed to identify SP patterns among cognitively impaired older individuals and evaluate their associations with subsequent cognitive function, specifically mental intactness and episodic memory. Methods: Data were drawn from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), including 5,673 individuals aged 60 years and older with cognitive impairment from 2015 to 2018. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify SP patterns, and hierarchical linear regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between these patterns and cognitive function. Results: Four distinct SP patterns were identified: "Offline Social Participation Group" (Class 1), "Intellectual Social Participation Only Group" (Class 2), "Club and Volunteer Activities Group" (Class 3), and "Minimal Social Participation Group" (Class 4). The Class 4 comprised the majority (73%) and exhibited the poorest cognitive outcomes. Compared to the Class 4, Class 2 showed significant improvements in mental intactness ( Conclusion: This study highlights the cognitive benefits of social participation, particularly intellectual activities, for older adults with cognitive impairment. Targeted interventions promoting SP, especially intellectual activities, are essential to mitigate cognitive decline and improve cognitive resilience in vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

Chinesecognitive impairmentlatent class analysisoldersocial participation

Identifiers

PMID40083340
PMCPMC11903710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.