ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2025
Predictive score for conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy - a prospective study.
Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors influencing the difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A review.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Critical appraisal of "predictive score for conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy - a prospective study" by V et al.Turkish journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: 2-15% of laparoscopic cholecystectomy gets converted to an open procedure due to various factors. The aim of this study was to identify pre-operative risk factors that could predict the conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. Pre-operative prediction would help in reducing the morbidity. Material and Methods: Adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a tertiary institute were included in the study. The parameters analysed were age, gender, body mass index, total count, liver function test, gall bladder size and wall thickness, impacted stone in Hartmann's pouch and common bile duct (CBD) diameter on ultrasonography. Intra-operative findings and the total number of conversions to open surgery were documented. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 16.0 Inc., IBM system. A univariate regression analysis was used to find the significant risk factors followed by multivariate linear regression. Results: Twenty-one of the 222 (9.5%) patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were converted to open cholecystectomy. Six variables were found significant on univariate analysis: Age, sex, total count, gallbladder wall thickness and size and diameter of the CBD. On logistic regression analysis, gall bladder wall thickness and size were found to be significant, and were used in the scoring system, wherein 1 point was given to each variable. The predicted risk of conversion was 0.5%, 1.8% and 7.2% for a score of zero, one and two respectively. Conclusion: The most significant factors predicting conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery were gall bladder size and wall thickness. This prediction can be used to minimize the time to conversion and reduce the morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.