ReviewBiophysical journal2025
FAIR data for optical tweezers experiments.
Review in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A FAIR road to a bioAFM databank.Nature methods · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The single-molecule biophysics community has delivered significant impacts to our understanding of fundamental biological processes, yet the field is also siloed and has fragmented data structures, which impede data sharing and limit the ability to conduct comprehensive meta-analyses. To advance the field of optical tweezers in single-molecule biophysics, it is important that the field adopts open and collaborative data sharing that facilitate meta-analyses that combine diverse resources and supports more advanced analyses, akin to those seen in projects such as the Protein Data Bank and the 1000 Genomes Project. Here, we assess the state of data findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability (the FAIR principles) within the single-molecule optical tweezers field. By combining a qualitative review with quantitative tools from bibliometrics, our analysis suggests that the field has significant room for improvement in terms of FAIR adherence. Finally, we discuss the potential of compulsory data deposition and a minimal set of metadata standards to ensure reproducibility and interoperability between systems. While implementing these measures may not be straightforward, they are key steps that will enhance the integration of optical tweezers biophysics with the broader biomedical literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.