Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40083158›Full record

ReviewBiophysical journal2025

FAIR data for optical tweezers experiments.

Matthew T J Halma, Sowmiyaa Kumar, Jan van Eck, Sanne Abeln, Alexander Gates, Gijs J L Wuite

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A FAIR road to a bioAFM databank.Nature methods · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew T J HalmaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, North Holland, the Netherlands; Lumicks B.V., Amsterdam, North Holland, the Netherlands.
Sowmiyaa KumarDepartment of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, North Holland, the Netherlands.
Jan van EckDepartment of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, North Holland, the Netherlands.
Sanne AbelnDepartment of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, North Holland, the Netherlands.
Alexander GatesSchool of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia. Electronic address: agates@virginia.edu.
Gijs J L WuiteDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, North Holland, the Netherlands; Lumicks B.V., Amsterdam, North Holland, the Netherlands. Electronic address: g.j.l.wuite@vu.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The single-molecule biophysics community has delivered significant impacts to our understanding of fundamental biological processes, yet the field is also siloed and has fragmented data structures, which impede data sharing and limit the ability to conduct comprehensive meta-analyses. To advance the field of optical tweezers in single-molecule biophysics, it is important that the field adopts open and collaborative data sharing that facilitate meta-analyses that combine diverse resources and supports more advanced analyses, akin to those seen in projects such as the Protein Data Bank and the 1000 Genomes Project. Here, we assess the state of data findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability (the FAIR principles) within the single-molecule optical tweezers field. By combining a qualitative review with quantitative tools from bibliometrics, our analysis suggests that the field has significant room for improvement in terms of FAIR adherence. Finally, we discuss the potential of compulsory data deposition and a minimal set of metadata standards to ensure reproducibility and interoperability between systems. While implementing these measures may not be straightforward, they are key steps that will enhance the integration of optical tweezers biophysics with the broader biomedical literature.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationOptical Tweezers

Identifiers

PMID40083158
PMCPMC12044397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.