ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
Determinants of knowledge of risks associated with cigarette smoking among adolescents in Scotland.
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tobacco smoking by disability status before and after COVID-19 onset: a repeated cross-sectional analysis of 1 087 678 adults.European journal of public health · 2026Article
- Loneliness and E-cigarette Use Among Adolescents in England: Evidence From the Smoking, Drinking and Drug Use Survey 2023.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2026Article
- Association between household secondhand tobacco smoke exposure and regular e-cigarette use among adolescents: evidence from a national school-based survey.European journal of public health · 2025Article
- Sex-stratified analysis of marketing exposure and current e-cigarette use among Saudi adolescents.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cigarette smoking remains a significant public health concern, particularly among adolescents. This study aimed to assess adolescents' knowledge of the risks associated with smoking in Scotland and explore the factors influencing this knowledge. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from the 2018 Scottish Schools Adolescent Lifestyle and Substance Use Survey. The sample included 23 365 adolescents from Secondary 2 (n = 12 558) and Secondary 4 (n = 10 807). Demographic, behavioural, contextual, and health-related factors were examined as predictors of smoking risk knowledge, with a cumulative knowledge score based on responses to seven smoking-related questions. Poisson regression was used to examine associations between predictors and cumulative knowledge scores, and adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Overall, 38.2% (n = 8928) of participants answered all questions correctly, with a median score of 6 (IQR: 5-7). While 83.6% (n = 19 540) scored at least 5, knowledge gaps remained, particularly concerning the risks of light smoking. Boys had lower scores than girls (IRR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96-0.97, P < .001), and adolescents from less deprived areas scored higher than those from more deprived areas (IRR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03, P = .006). Non-smokers had higher scores than smokers (IRR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.05-1.10, P < .001), and adolescents confident in accessing health information scored significantly higher (IRR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.11-1.15, P < .001). Peer influence was evident, as adolescents with friends who smoked had lower scores (IRR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94-0.98, P < .001). Adolescents in Scotland generally understand the risks of cigarette smoking, but notable gaps persist, especially regarding dangers of light smoking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.