ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2025
Glycemic control is worse in rural compared to urban type 2 diabetes in Bangladesh, irrespective of food security status.
Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes: a multiregional study in rural Bangladesh.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Underlying Determinants of Glycemic Control Among Diabetic Patients in Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- The relationship between depressive symptoms and glycemic control is stronger in women with type 2 diabetes in South Asians: Results from a cross-sectional multicenter study.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025Article
- Letter to the editor in response to "Glycemic control is worse in rural compared to urban type 2 diabetes in Bangladesh, irrespective of food security status".Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFood insecurity (FIS) affects around 25% of Bangladesh's population, and data from developed nations report higher FIS rates among individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D), potentially worsening glycemic control. The importance of FIS to T2D has not been studied in developing countries such as Bangladesh, with substantial disparities in healthcare access, especially between rural and urban areas. We evaluated the relationships between food insecurity and glycemic control in the context of area of residence among individuals with T2D in Bangladesh.
methodsA total of 849 individuals with T2D attending diabetes clinics in four districts of Bangladesh completed a validated questionnaire to assess the FIS (a score ≥ 3 is indicative of FIS), which was compared with their sociodemographic and biochemical data. Two-way anova and multiple linear and binary logistic regression analyses were performed.
resultsBoth HbA1c levels (10.8% vs 9.5, P < 0.001) and the prevalence of FIS (45.8% vs 31.4%, P < 0.001) were higher in rural areas. According to two-way anova (0.87-1.78% mean difference, P < 0.05) and multiple linear regression model (β = 1.4, P < 0.001), HbA1c levels were also higher among rural than urban dwellers, irrespective of their FIS status. Rural dwellers were also more than twice as likely to have suboptimal glycemic control (HbA1c ≥7%; AOR: 2.26 (1.35-3.97), P < 0.05), irrespective of their food security status (AOR: 1.19 (0.78-1.84, P > 0.05)).
conclusionsIn Bangladesh, rural residence is associated with poor glycemic control, irrespective of food security status, and thus is an important social determinant of diabetes care that warrants further exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.