ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Anatomically Veridical On-Scalp Sensor Topographies.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SPM-30 years and beyond.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When working with sensor-level data recorded using on-scalp neuroimaging methods such as electroencephalography (EEG), it is common practice to use two-dimensional (2D) representations of sensor positions to aid interpretation. Positioning of sensors relative to anatomy, as in the classic 10-20 system of EEG electrode placement, enables the use of 2D topographies that are familiar to many researchers and clinicians. However, when using another increasingly popular on-scalp neuroimaging method, optically pumped magnetometer-based magnetoencephalography (OP-MEG), bespoke sensor arrays are much more common, and these are not prepared according to any standard principle. Consequently, polar projection is often used to produce individual sensor topographies that are not directly related to anatomy and cannot be averaged across people simply. Given the current proliferation of OP-MEG facilities globally, this issue will become an increasing hindrance when visualising OP-MEG data, particularly for group studies. To address this problem, we adapted and extended the 10-20 system to build a flexible, anatomical projection method applied to digitised head shape, fiducials and sensor positions. We demonstrate that the method maintains spatially veridical representations across individuals improving on standard polar projections at varying OPM sensor array densities. By applying our projection method, the benefits of anatomically veridical 2D topographies can now be enjoyed when visualising data, such as those from OP-MEG, regardless of variation in sensor placement as in sparse or focal arrays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.