ReviewBioelectronic medicine2025
Overcoming failure: improving acceptance and success of implanted neural interfaces.
Review in Bioelectronic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implantable pelvic neurostimulators to restore erectile function: from concept to practice.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Wireless, Adaptable and Fully Implantable Battery-powered Devices for Optical Stimulation of the Spinal Cord in Small Rodents.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Animal models of spinal cord injury in neuro-urological research.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Ion-shielding ultrathin encapsulation with hot-press bonded interface enables chronic stretchable bioelectronics.Science advances · 2026Article
- Friend, Not Foe: Lowered Tissue Reactivity to Long-Term Polyimide Implants.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Neural Interfaces for Bioelectronic Medicine.Bioelectronic medicine · 2026Article
- A fully implantable intraspinal microstimulation device for early preclinical evaluation of feasibility, stability, and functionality.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Friend, not Foe: Lowered Tissue Reactivity to Long-Term Polyimide Implants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Optoelectronic Interfaces for Nongenetic Modulation of Excitable Tissues.Small methods · 2026Review
- Electrochemical characterization and chronic stability of Utah electrode arrays for intracortical microstimulation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Long-term Intracortical Neural activity and Kinematics (LINK): An intracortical neural dataset for chronic brain-machine interfaces, neuroscience, and machine learning.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2025Article
- Autonomous Implants.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Characterizing spinal reflexes evoked by sensory spinal cord stimulation in people with lower-limb amputation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Reliability and stability of Bioelectronic Medicine: a critical and pedagogical perspective.Bioelectronic medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implanted neural interfaces are electronic devices that stimulate or record from neurons with the purpose of improving the quality of life of people who suffer from neural injury or disease. Devices have been designed to interact with neurons throughout the body to treat a growing variety of conditions. The development and use of implanted neural interfaces is increasing steadily and has shown great success, with implants lasting for years to decades and improving the health and quality of life of many patient populations. Despite these successes, implanted neural interfaces face a multitude of challenges to remain effective for the lifetime of their users. The devices are comprised of several electronic and mechanical components that each may be susceptible to failure. Furthermore, implanted neural interfaces, like any foreign body, will evoke an immune response. The immune response will differ for implants in the central nervous system and peripheral nervous system, as well as over time, ultimately resulting in encapsulation of the device. This review describes the challenges faced by developers of neural interface systems, particularly devices already in use in humans. The mechanical and technological failure modes of each component of an implant system is described. The acute and chronic reactions to devices in the peripheral and central nervous system and how they affect system performance are depicted. Further, physical challenges such as micro and macro movements are reviewed. The clinical implications of device failures are summarized and a guide for determining the severity of complication was developed and provided. Common methods to diagnose and examine mechanical, technological, and biological failure modes at various stages of development and testing are outlined, with an emphasis on chronic in vivo characterization of implant systems. Finally, this review concludes with an overview of some of the innovative solutions developed to reduce or resolve the challenges faced by implanted neural interface systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.