ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Comparison of ROX index with modified indices incorporating heart rate, flow rate, and PaO
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncorporation of heart rate, flow rate, and PaO
methodsThis single-centre 6-year retrospective study included subjects initiated on HFNC post-extubation. The modified indices (ROX-HR, ROX-HR-Flow and POX-HR-Flow) incorporated HFNC flow rate, heart rate and substituted PF ratio for SF ratio. Evaluation was performed using AUROC and cut-offs assessed for prediction of HFNC outcomes.
resultsEighty-one subjects were initiated on HFNC post-extubation, of whom 67 patients (82.7%) had HFNC success. ROX-HR-Flow at 2 h post-HFNC initiation demonstrated the best prediction accuracy (AUROC 0.854, 95% CI 0.756-0.952). A ROX-HR-Flow > 12.25 at 2 h post-HFNC initiation was significantly associated with a lower risk of HFNC failure (Sensitivity 77.6% and Specificity 85.7%).
conclusionsOur proposed modified index at 2 h post-HFNC initiation (ROX-HR-Flow), may facilitate early and accurate prediction of HFNC outcomes compared to ROX index among subjects initiated on HFNC in the post-extubation setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.