ArticleBMC palliative care2025
Palliative care: a foreign language? Nurses' perspectives on palliative care in a French comprehensive cancer centre.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntegrated patient-centred palliative care for cancer patients is widely advocated internationally, but promoting it often proves difficult. The literature suggests that one key factor is physicians' perspectives of palliative care (PC). Nurses' views, however, from their pivotal stance within the healthcare team between patients and physicians, have been less well researched. This study explores French nurses' perspectives on PC, how their view frames their role, and how they experience PC implementation. Nurses' discourse is then explored as a reflection of their experience.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were audio-recorded of 21 registered nurses, purposively sampled, in a French comprehensive cancer centre. Reflexive thematic analysis was applied by a team including a patients' rights representative (a PC carer and applied linguist), the quality manager, and three PC physicians. Considerations of speech emphasis and style completed the analysis.
resultsAnalysis generated three themes. Nurses perceive PC as a complex and continuous journey, passing through phases to the end of life. It revolves around patients' physical and psychological well-being, timeliness, patient communication and empowerment. This perception frames their caring role as members of the healthcare team, based on necessary knowledge, training, and working conditions allowing them to fulfil their mission. Consequently, they experience PC implementation as either a virtuous or a vicious circle and suggest ways to improve the latter. Analysis of nurses' discourse enhances the meaningfulness of the thematic analysis, reflecting that the more difficult the care context, the more in-depth the description and the more evaluative and emphatic the words chosen.
conclusionsThese French nurses see their holistic view of PC as diverging from that of physicians, keeping them (painfully) from fulfilling their caregiving role. While the nurses are able to "speak PC" with patients, they see it as a foreign concept/language for physicians (and management), resulting in a sometimes vicious circle of care. Physicians' and management's openness to hearing nurses' views would be a first step towards patient and professional well-being. As the nurses suggest, a palliative approach and communication skills can be learned, and institutions can commit to rethinking priorities, policies, and resources. PC can become a shared language.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.