Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40082895›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025

Machine learning-derived diagnostic model of epithelial ovarian cancer based on gut microbiome signatures.

Cheng Chen, Chengyuan Deng, Yanwen Li, Shuguang He, Yunhong Liu, Shuwen Pan, Wenqian Xu, Lu Fang, Yixi Zhu, Yingying Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cheng Chen *Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Traditional Chinese Medical College, Hunan Province Directly Affiliated TCM Hospital, Zhuzhou, China.
Chengyuan Deng *Hunan Traditional Chinese Medical College, Zhuzhou, China.
Yanwen LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Shenzhen Longhua Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Shuguang HeDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Traditional Chinese Medical College, Hunan Province Directly Affiliated TCM Hospital, Zhuzhou, China.
Yunhong LiuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, People's Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, China.
Shuwen PanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, People's Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, China.
Wenqian XuChangsha Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Changsha, China.
Lu FangXuzhou First People's Hospital, Xuzhou, China.
Yixi ZhuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Traditional Chinese Medical College, Hunan Province Directly Affiliated TCM Hospital, Zhuzhou, China.
Yingying WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Traditional Chinese Medical College, Hunan Province Directly Affiliated TCM Hospital, Zhuzhou, China.
Xiaoxin JiangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, People's Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, China. jiangxiaoxin168@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5990-6064

Funding

Hunan Natural Science Foundation 2019JJ80064Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2023JJ60350Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality JCYJ20210324131414040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior studies have elucidated that alterations in gut microbiota are associated with a spectrum of tumors and metabolic disorders. However, the diagnostic value of gut microbiota in epithelial ovarian cancer remains insufficiently investigated.

methodsA total of 34 patients with a diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), 15 patients with benign ovarian tumors (TB), and 30 healthy volunteers (NOR) were enrolled in this study. Fecal samples were collected, followed by sequencing of the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. The clinical data and pathological characteristics were comprehensively recorded for further analysis, PICRUSt2 was utilized to conduct an analysis of microbial functional predictions, WGCNA networks were constructed by integrating microbiome and clinical data. LEfSe analysis was employed to identify microbial diagnostic markers, LASSO and SVM analyses were used to screen microbial diagnostic markers in conjunction with the Cally index, to establish a Microbial-Cally diagnostic model. Bootstrap resampling was utilized for the internal validation of the model, whereas the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and decision curve analysis (DCA) were employed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the model. Plasma samples were subjected to untargeted metabolomics profiling, followed by differential analysis to identify key metabolites that are significantly altered in epithelial ovarian cancer. At the same time, Spearman correlation analysis was used to study the association between key microbiota and differential metabolites. The supernatants from Escherichia coli and Bifidobacterium cultures were co-cultured with SKOV3 cells. Cell proliferation, migration, and invasion were evaluated using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay, Transwell migration and invasion assays. Apoptosis was assessed by flow cytometry analysis of fluorescence signals from Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) staining.

resultsCompared to Nor and TB populations, individuals diagnosed with EOC demonstrated a significantly diminished gut microbiota diversity when contrasted with both normal controls and those presenting benign conditions. Specifically, the relative abundance of Bilophila, Bifidobacterium, and other probiotics was significantly reduced in patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), while Escherichia and Shigella demonstrated a marked enrichment within this cohort. Differential microorganisms were identified through the application of machine learning techniques to delineate the characteristic microbial profiles associated with the EOC patients. A significant correlation was identified between the Cally index and microorganisms. In conclusion, we utilized microbial biomarkers alongside the Cally to establish a diagnostic model for epithelial ovarian cancer, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.976 (95%CI 0.943-1.00), The AUC obtained from the Bootstrap internal validation was 0.974. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test revealed a robust concordance between the observed probabilities and the predicted probabilities generated by the model. The decision curve analysis revealed that the model provided a significant net clinical benefit. A total of 233 differential metabolites were identified between the EOC group and the NT (NOR and TB) groups. Among these, eight specific metabolites (HMDB0243492, C09265, HMDB0242046, HMDB0240606, C04171, HMDB0060557, HMDB0252797, and C21412) were exclusively derived from the microbiome. Notably, metabolite HMDB0240606 exhibited a significant positive correlation with Escherichia coli and Shigella, while it showed a significant negative correlation with Ruminococcus. In vitro studies demonstrated that Bifidobacterium possessed anti-tumor activity, whereas Escherichia coli exhibited pro-tumor activity.

conclusionThis study provides the inaugural comprehensive analysis of gut microbiota composition and its differential profiles among patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, those with benign ovarian tumors, and healthy controls in Hunan province, China.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMachine LearningModels, BiologicalOvarian NeoplasmsAdultCase-Control StudiesFecesFemaleHumansMetabolomicsMiddle AgedRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SEnterotype diagnostic modelEpithelial ovarian cancerGut microbiota

Identifiers

PMID40082895
PMCPMC11905570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.