ArticleBMC cancer2025
Clinical outcomes of particle beam radiation therapy for patients with newly-diagnosed major salivary gland tumors.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMajor salivary gland tumors (MSGTs) are rare and pose significant treatment challenges. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of particle beam radiotherapy (PBRT) for patients with newly-diagnosed MSGTs.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 82 patients treated at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center (SPHIC) between August 2015 and March 2022. The cohort received various radiotherapy regimens based on surgical history and pathological risk factors. We evaluated survival outcomes, treatment toxicity, and potential prognostic factors.
resultsOur findings revealed promising 3-year survival rates: 94.3% for overall survival (OS), 81.3% for progression-free survival (PFS), 97.2% for locoregional control (LRC), and 82.6% for distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Acute and late toxicities were generally mild to moderate, with a favorable safety profile. Distant metastasis was the primary mode of treatment failure, emphasizing the need for early risk assessment.
conclusionAs a potentially safe and efficient treatment option for newly-diagnosed MSGTs, proton and carbon ion radiation offers an excellent alternative for traditional methods. More investigation is required to determine the long-term results and relative efficacy of various treatment modality for major salivary gland cancer when compared to photon therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.