Trial reportBMC medical education2025
Application of the BOPPPS-CBL model in emergency chest pain management teaching for resident physicians: a randomized comparison.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07755878 (Supervised Hospital-Based Practice Versus Matched Online Activities in Cardiac Rehabilitation Training for Cardiology Residents), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Supervised Hospital-Based Practice Versus Matched Online Activities in Cardiac Rehabilitation Training for Cardiology Residents: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of the BOPPPS-CBL teaching model in gynaecological clinical internships: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Effectiveness evaluation of standardized patient training system on emergency department residents in disposing patients with acute chest pain.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChest pain is very common in emergency department. The management of chest pain is a priority for resident physicians. This study aimed to verify the teaching effects of the combination of bridge-in, objective, preassessment, participatory learning, post-assessment, and summary and case-based learning (BOPPPS-CBL) model in emergency chest pain management teaching for resident physicians.
methodsThis randomized controlled trial study enrolled 118 resident physicians undergoing standardized training during their Cardiology Department rotation. They were randomized in two groups: traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) group and BOPPPS-CBL group. Pre-class test (30 points), post-class test (30 points), Mini clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX), and direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) were analyzed. The satisfaction of two teaching models and self-adjustment by two groups were further analyzed.
resultsA total of 118 resident physicians were enrolled and the mean age was 26.96 years and 57.6% were males. There was no statistical difference in the pre-class test scores between two groups (17.03 ± 4.16 vs. 17.08 ± 3.87, P = 0.945). BOPPPS-CBL group's post-class test, Mini-CEX and DOPS total scores were significantly higher than those of the LBL group (all P < 0.05). Additionally, the satisfaction and self-adjustment ability of resident physicians in the BOPPPS-CBL group were significantly higher than those in the LBL group (all P < 0.05).
conclusionThe BOPPPS-CBL model could be an effective teaching method in emergency chest pain management teaching for resident physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.