ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
A fall risk prediction model based on the CHARLS database for older individuals in China.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a cardiometabolic multimorbidity prediction model in middle-aged and older adults.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction model for fall risk among individuals with arthritis in China: an analysis using the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) database.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Falls Among Hospitalized Older Adults: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR aging · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning-based predictive model for fall risk in older adults receiving maintenance hemodialysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting 90-day falls and unplanned medical visits in nursing home residents using rapid nursing scores including calf circumference, grip strength, Timed Up and go (TUG) test, weight change, and appetite: a prospective observational cohort study protocol.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Association and predictive value analysis for mobility assessments and concerns about falling on falls in community-dwelling older adults: a prospective cohort study in China.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Fear of falling among housebound older adults: a quantitative study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Edentulism as an independent risk factor for sarcopenia: evidence from cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses based on the CHARLS cohort.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Activity of daily living impairment mediates the relationship between pain and falls in Chinese older adults: a cohort study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Urban-rural disparities in fall risk among older Chinese adults: insights from machine learning-based predictive models.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFalls represent the second leading cause of injury-related mortality among older adults globally. The occurrence of falls is the consequence of the interaction of numerous complex risk factors. The objective of this study was to develop a validated fall risk prediction model for the Chinese older individuals.
methodsThe study used data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), a dataset representative of the Chinese population. Thirty-eight indicators including biological factors, behavioral factors and health status were analyzed in this study. The study cohort was randomly divided into the training set (70%) and the validation set (30%). Variables were screened using LASSO regression analysis, the best predictive model based on 10-fold cross-validation, logistic regression model was applied to explore the correlates of fall risk in the older individuals, a nomogram was constructed to develop the predictive model, calibration curves were applied to assess the accuracy of the nomogram model, and predictive performance was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis.
resultA total of 4,913 cases from the 2015 CHARLS database for people aged 60 years and older were ultimately included, and a total of 1,082 (22.02%) of the older individuals had experienced a fall within two years. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that Sleeping time, Hearing, Grip strength, ADL score, Cognition, Depression, Health, KD, and Pain DRUG were predictors of fall risk in the older individuals. These factors were used to construct nomogram models that showed good agreement and accuracy. The AUC value for the predictive model was 0.644 (95% CI = 0.621-0.666), with a specificity of 0.695 and a sensitivity of 0.522. For the internal validation set, the AUC value was 0.644 (95% CI = 0.611-0.678), with a specificity of 0.629 and a sensitivity of 0.577. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test value of the model for the training set is p = 0.9368 and for the validation set is p = 0.8545 (both > 0.05). The calibration curves show a more significant agreement between the nomogram model and the actual observations. The ROC and DCA indicate a better predictive performance of the nomogram.
conclusionThe comprehensive nomogram constructed in this study is a promising and convenient tool for assessing the risk of falls in the Chinese older individuals and to help older adults understand the risk level of falls, avoid and eliminate modifiable risk factors, and reduce the incidence of falls. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.