ArticleBMC cancer2025
Long term survival in elderly patients with resectable upper tract urothelial carcinoma: analysis of hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo clarify the long-term prognoses of elderly upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients after surgery.
methodsWe used a hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan to extract patients with pT1-3N0M0 UTUC diagnosed in 2009 who underwent surgery, and classified them by age group (≤ 64, 65-74, ≥ 75 years old). We estimated the 10-year overall survival (OS) by a Kaplan-Meier analysis. For cancer survival estimation, we calculated the 10-year net survival (NS) by Pohar-Preme method using the Japanese life tables.
resultsA total of 1139 UTUC patients (564 renal pelvic cancer [RPC] and 575 ureteral cancer [UrC]) were identified. The 10-year OS rates for elderly RPC patients (≥ 75 years old) were significantly worse than for younger patients (≤ 64 years old) in pT1 (43.1% vs. 80.1%) and pT2-3 (34.2% vs. 67.3%) stages. In contrast, the 10-year NS rates were comparable between elderly and younger RPC groups in pT1 (93.3% vs. 87.0%) and T2-3 (77.4% vs. 73.7%) stages. While the 10-year NS and OS rates of patients with pT1 UrC had similar trends as RPC patients, the NS and OS rates of elderly patients with pT2-3 UrC were significantly worse than younger patients.
conclusionsAmong resectable UTUC, except for pT2-3 UrC patients, estimated cancer survival rates for elderly patients were similar to younger patients. These findings may be useful in shared decision making by informing discussions about treatment strategies with elderly patients and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.