ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Diagnostic accuracy of an antigen-based point-of-care test versus nucleic acid amplification testing for genital trichomoniasis among pregnant women attending antenatal care facilities in Zambia.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and correlates of active syphilis diagnosed using serological assays and the molecular research-use-only AptimaFrontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Prevalence and epidemiology ofFrontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInfection with Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) is the most prevalent curable sexually transmitted infection (STI) globally and is associated with prelabour rupture of membranes, preterm delivery, and low birthweight. Point-of-care (POC) testing for TV during pregnancy may facilitate rapid antenatal case detection and treatment. This study, part of the World Health Organization's global ProSPeRo study, aimed to evaluate the performance of OSOM® Trichomonas Rapid Test, an antigen-based POC test, against a reference nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) among pregnant women in Zambia. We also assessed the operational characteristics and patient acceptability of the POC test, within the context of WHO's target product profiles for STI POC tests.
methodsWe enrolled pregnant women attending four health centres in Nchelenge, Zambia, for antenatal care between 15 February and 26 May 2023. Vaginal swabs for the TV POC test and a reference NAAT (Aptima® Trichomonas vaginalis assay) were obtained. POC test results were read independently by two study staff members. Study staff filled a questionnaire on the operational characteristics of the POC test, and participants were asked about their willingness to wait for results.
resultsPaired POC and reference test samples were collected from 1,015 participants. Overall, 23.0% (233/1015) tested positive for TV by NAAT, and 15.3% (155/1015) tested positive by the POC test, with three inconclusive results. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the POC test were 66.4% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 57.7-74.1%) and 99.6% (95% CI: 98.8-99.9%), respectively. Sensitivity was higher among those with TV-associated symptoms compared to those without (83.6% versus 60.4%, relative ratio 1.39, 95% CI 1.14-1.68). Inter-rater agreement was 99.7% (Cohen's Kappa 0.989). The study staff (n = 14) found the test easy to use and interpret, with most staff (12/14) reporting results were available within 25 min.
conclusionOverall, the TV POC test showed lower sensitivity than WHO's 85% target, but exceeded the 99% specificity target. Among symptomatic pregnant women, sensitivity nearly reached the WHO target. The assay was user-friendly, required minimal training, and delivered results quickly. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal antenatal settings for this technology.
trial registrationPACTR202302766902029.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.