Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40082775›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Caregiver and care team perspectives of caregiver psychological distress and well-being during critical care hospitalization: a qualitative study.

Amanda C Blok, Lauren Gauntlett, Mayank Jayaram, Sarah L Krein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amanda C BlokCenter for Clinical Management Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Mail Stop 152, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA. amanda.blok@va.gov.
Lauren GauntlettCenter for Clinical Management Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Mail Stop 152, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.
Mayank JayaramDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W. 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Sarah L KreinCenter for Clinical Management Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Mail Stop 152, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.

Funding

Health Services Research and Development SFT 21-102HSRD VA IK6 HX003399HSRD VA RCS 11-222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily caregiver psychological distress during an older adult's critical care hospitalization can compromise their well-being and ability to function in a supportive role for patient recovery. Understanding factors influencing family caregiver distress and well-being during this period is crucial for developing approaches to support caregiver health. We sought to better understand and compare caregiver and care team member perspectives about factors and strategies that affect psychological distress and well-being among family caregivers during a critical care hospitalization.

methodsUsing a qualitative design, we conducted a directed content analysis of semi-structured interview data collected from 20 family caregivers of Veterans in critical care and 12 care team members at a US Veterans Affairs medical and surgical intensive care unit between October 2020 and July 2021. We examined factors related to caregiver psychological distress or well-being. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines were followed.

resultsFactors identified as related to caregiver psychological distress by caregivers and care team members included unfamiliarity with the health system, care team, and treatment processes; uncertainties about the illness and patient appearance; and responsibilities associated with the caregiver role. Factors related to caregiver well-being included proactive and personal communication, and a comfortable and respectful environment. Within these factors, however, there were differences in focus between caregivers and care teams. Caregivers focused on unfamiliar treatment processes, with unmet expectations around predictable communication. Few care team members indicated awareness of this concern. Other family, home, or caregiving responsibilities were described by caregivers as contributing to distress but were not mentioned by care team members. Caregivers discussed proactive communication by the care team that occurred either in-person or over the phone as emotionally supportive. Care team members emphasized in-person communication and videoconference options as beneficial and comforting to caregivers during visitor restrictions. The impact of a comfortable and respectful environment was recognized as promoting caregiver well-being by primarily non-clinical care team members.

conclusionsWe found parallels between the factors identified by caregivers and care teams related to caregiver psychological distress and well-being, yet often with differences in focus. These findings provide essential information for addressing factors contributing to distress and developing practices that support caregiver well-being.

Indexed as

CaregiversCritical CareHospitalizationPatient Care TeamPsychological DistressStress, PsychologicalAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUnited StatesVeteransCritical careCritical illnessFamily caregiverHospitalizationPsychological distress

Identifiers

PMID40082775
PMCPMC11905728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.