Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2025
Comparison of noninvasive electrical cardiometry and transpulmonary thermodilution for cardiac output measurement in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07321405 (Non Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume in Septic Shock Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Non Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume in Septic Shock Patients
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Significance of Peripheral Perfusion Changes During Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Critically Ill Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Effects of Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Cardiovascular Responsiveness in Healthy Individuals.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Obesity: a challenge for emergency medical teams-a narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiac output (CO) monitoring is essential for diagnosing and managing critically ill patients. Recently, a non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring technique, electrical cardiometry (EC), has gathered increasing interest among ICU physicians. This study aimed to explore the accuracy of CO estimated by non-invasive EC (CO
methodsThis prospective, observational, single-center study was conducted from April 2021 to April 2023, involving patients who required haemodynamic monitoring using a transpulmonary thermodilution device (PiCCO). CO
resultsSeventy-two patients with PiCCO haemodynamic monitoring were included, yielding 285 paired CO measurements. The bias between CO
conclusionIn critically ill patients, non-invasive EC indicated limited accuracy in measuring CO, along with a restricted ability to reliably track CO changes. These findings suggested that EC may not be interchangeable with TPTD in the general ICU population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.