ArticleScientific reports2025
Insight into the inhibitory activity of mangiferin and Silybin against HER2 and EGFR using theoretical and experimental approaches.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Recurrence in Triple-Positive Breast Cancer (ER+/PR+/HER2+) and Potential Repurposing of Multi-Target Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The potential utility of in-silico approach in identifying phytochemicals against various targets for the management of lung cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Benchmarking the Ligand-HER2 Interactions Using Machine Learning and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Combined experimental and computational investigation of vildagliptin: spectroscopy, electronic structure, MD and Docking to EGFR, VEGFR2, and HER2 anticancer targets.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2025Article
- Multitarget Design of Steroidal Inhibitors Against Hormone-Dependent Breast Cancer: An Integrated In Silico Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the advances made in diagnosing and treating breast cancer, it continues to pose a significant threat to women's health. High-risk mutations can lead to high resistance to current treatments and poor prognosis. Therefore, new treatment strategies are needed. Mangiferin and silybin, two natural substances obtained from plants, have demonstrated encouraging results as anticancer drugs. This study investigated the activity of these compounds against two therapeutic targets, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). We assessed the binding affinity and stability of these compounds with the active sites of wild-type and mutated HER2 and EGFR by using computational screening techniques, namely molecular docking, density functional theory, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with the MMGBSA method. We used molecular docking, triplicate MD simulations summing 300 ns each, and density functional theory analysis to estimate the binding mechanism of mangiferin and silybin inside the wild-type and mutated EGFR and HER2 active regions. Moreover, an in vitro experiment showed that mangiferin and silybin inhibited the growth of two HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines, BT-474 and SK-BR-3, at micromolar concentrations. These findings suggest the potential for developing novel anticancer therapies that specifically target EGFR and HER2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.