Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40082638›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An interpretable dimensional reduction technique with an explainable model for detecting attacks in Internet of Medical Things devices.

Swati Lipsa, Ranjan Kumar Dash, Nikola Ivković

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Swati LipsaSchool of Computer Sciences, Odisha University of Technology and Research, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Ranjan Kumar DashSchool of Computer Sciences, Odisha University of Technology and Research, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. rkdash@outr.ac.in.
Nikola IvkovićFaculty of Organization and Informatics, University of Zagreb, Varazdin, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The security of Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) devices is crucial for ensuring the integrity and reliability of patients' medical data. These devices, operating over TCP and ICMP protocols, are highly susceptible to cyberattacks. While machine learning models can detect these attacks with acceptable accuracy, their operational mechanisms remain unclear, leaving the decision-making process of the models undefined. Moreover, the accuracy and training time of machine learning models is more questionable when the datasets has large number of sparse features and class imbalances. This study introduces an interpretable feature selection technique designed to enhance intrusion detection in IoMT by reducing redundant features and improving model efficiency. Random Forest-based explainable AI model provides transparency in attack classification and better decision-making. The simulated results employing the CICIoMT2024 dataset demonstrate that the proposed method significantly improves detection performance, with the Random Forest model achieving 99% accuracy, outperforming XGBoost (98%), Decision Tree (97%), and Support Vector (98%), while ensuring explainability through SHAP-based feature analysis. Thus, the simulation outcomes reveal the key contributing factors for various cyberattacks on IoMT, facilitating enhanced security measures and real-time monitoring. The proposed approach boosts detection accuracy and interpretability, making it highly suitable for real-world IoMT security applications.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityInternet of ThingsAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningModels, TheoreticalDimensionality reduction techniqueExplainable machine learning modelFeature importance scoreIoMT devices

Identifiers

PMID40082638
PMCPMC11906639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.