ArticleScientific reports2025
A dual branch model for predicting microseismic magnitude time series named DTFNet.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microseismic monitoring is crucial in realizing intelligent early warning of coal mine rockbursts. Utilizing historical microseismic monitoring data to predict future microseismic events effectively enhances the accuracy of impact disaster prediction and early warning. Due to the complexity and nonlinearity of microseismic data, conventional time series prediction models struggle to forecast them accurately. Therefore, this paper proposes a microseismic time series prediction model, DTFNet, which integrates time series decomposition and deep learning. Initially, the original microseismic magnitude data is decomposed, reconstructed, and subjected to secondary decomposition using complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition, permutation entropy, and variational mode decomposition. Subsequently, a dual branch time series prediction model is constructed, which effectively models the microseismic time series data and deeply extracts the features contained in the microseismic magnitude data. This paper uses microseismic monitoring catalogs from multiple working faces as the dataset to predict microseismic magnitudes. The model's performance is evaluated using four metrics: mean squared error, mean absolute error, relative standard error, and root mean squared error. Experiments show that the proposed method effectively predicts the trend of microseismic magnitude changes and demonstrates good generalization and accuracy. Compared to several popular deep learning time series prediction models, DTFNet reduces the four evaluation metrics by an average of 23%, 18.1%, 11.1%, and 12%, respectively, showcasing a significant competitive advantage.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.