ArticleScientific reports2025
A robust deep learning approach for segmenting cortical and trabecular bone from 3D high resolution µCT scans of mouse bone.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Assessment of Cortical Porosity in Preclinical Models: Time-lapse Imaging of Cortical Remodeling.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026Review
- Review of image segmentation techniques for biomedical micro-CT: from laboratory absorption imaging to synchrotron phase-contrast.Npj imaging · 2026Review
- Micro-CT-based analysis of the murine osteochondral unit: a review and recommendations for standardized subchondral bone assessment.JBMR plus · 2026Review
- Demystifying machine learning approaches in digital bone imaging using microCT and HRpQCT.Bone reports · 2026Review
- Advancements in High-Resolution Computed Tomography: Revolutionising Bone Health Micro-Research.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A deep learning-based framework for standardized analysis of trabecular bone compartments from micro-CT imaging data in the mouse tibia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Finite Element Analysis of Von Mises Stress in External Fixators for Open Tibial Fractures: A Comparative Study of ASTM F1541-02 and Tibia-Based Models in Indonesian Patients.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advancements in deep learning have significantly enhanced the segmentation of high-resolution microcomputed tomography (µCT) bone scans. In this paper, we present the dual-branch attention-based hybrid network (DBAHNet), a deep learning architecture designed for automatically segmenting the cortical and trabecular compartments in 3D µCT scans of mouse tibiae. DBAHNet's hierarchical structure combines transformers and convolutional neural networks to capture long-range dependencies and local features for improved contextual representation. We trained DBAHNet on a limited dataset of 3D µCT scans of mouse tibiae and evaluated its performance on a diverse dataset collected from seven different research studies. This evaluation covered variations in resolutions, ages, mouse strains, drug treatments, surgical procedures, and mechanical loading. DBAHNet demonstrated excellent performance, achieving high accuracy, particularly in challenging scenarios with significantly altered bone morphology. The model's robustness and generalization capabilities were rigorously tested under diverse and unseen conditions, confirming its effectiveness in the automated segmentation of high-resolution µCT mouse tibia scans. Our findings highlight DBAHNet's potential to provide reliable and accurate 3D µCT mouse tibia segmentation, thereby enhancing and accelerating preclinical bone studies in drug development. The model and code are available at https://github.com/bigfahma/DBAHNet .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.