Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40082590›Full record

Reviewnpj antimicrobials and resistance2025

How AI can help us beat AMR.

Autumn Arnold, Stewart McLellan, Jonathan M Stokes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in npj antimicrobials and resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. ASP-COMPLEX: redefining antimicrobial stewardship to improve outcomes in high-risk patients with severe infections.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Autumn Arnold *Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Stewart McLellan *Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jonathan M StokesDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. stokesjm@mcmaster.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an urgent public health threat. Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and increases in computational power have resulted in the adoption of AI for biological tasks. This review explores the application of AI in bacterial infection diagnostics, AMR surveillance, and antibiotic discovery. We summarize contemporary AI models applied to each of these domains, important considerations when applying AI across diverse tasks, and current limitations in the field.

Identifiers

PMID40082590
PMCPMC11906734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.