ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of machine learning-based prediction model for outcome of cardiac arrest in intensive care units.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of Neurological Outcome and Mortality in Cardiac Arrest Patients: An Explainable Machine Learning Study Integrating HRV, EEG, and Clinical Features.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Construction of a predictive nomogram for ICU mortality in patients with cardiac arrest using the MIMIC-IV database and the eICU Collaborative Research Database.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Multivariable Machine Learning Model for Mortality Prediction among Intensive Care Unit Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for consciousness disorders in stroke patients in the intensive care unit (ICU): a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Trajectory-Defined Thrombo-Inflammatory Phenotypes Predict 30-Day ICU Mortality in Post-cardiac Arrest Syndrome: A Multicenter Retrospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac arrest (CA) poses a significant global health challenge and often results in poor prognosis. We developed an interpretable and applicable machine learning (ML) model for predicting in-hospital mortality of CA patients who survived more than 72 h. A total of 721 patients were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database, divided into the training set (n = 576) and the internal validation set (n = 145). The external validation set containing 856 cases were collected from four tertiary hospitals in Zhejiang Province. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Eleven ML algorithms were utilized to establish prediction models based on data from 72 h after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The results indicate that the CatBoost model exhibited the best performance at 72 h. Eleven variables were ultimately selected as key features by recursive feature elimination (RFE) to construct a compact model. The final model achieved the highest AUC of 0.86 (0.80, 0.92) in the internal validation and 0.76 (0.73, 0.79) in the external validation. SHAP summary plots and force plots visually explained the predicted outcomes. In conclusion, 72-h CatBoost showed promising performance in predicting in-hospital mortality of CA patients who survived more than 72 h. The model still requires further optimization and improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.