ArticleScientific reports2025
A data driven approach to urban area delineation using multi source geospatial data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces a data-driven, bottom-up approach to urban delineation, integrating feature engineering with the Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) algorithm, which represents a significant improvement in precision and methodology compared to traditional approaches that rely on simplistic OpenStreetMap (OSM) road node data aggregations. By employing a broad array of OSM categories and refining data selection through feature engineering, our research significantly enhances the precision and relevance of urban clustering. Using Bavaria, Germany, as a case study, we demonstrate that feature engineering effectively reduces noise and mitigates common DBSCAN clustering pitfalls by filtering out irrelevant and autocorrelated data. The robustness of the proposed method is validated through a comprehensive assessment involving three key elements: (1) a 5% improvement in average accuracy, (2) optimal clustering selections based on entropy values that eliminate the need for prior knowledge, and (3) validation through nighttime light data and Zipf's law, where a high p-value of 0.99 confirms a good fit, supporting the power law. This study contributes to urban studies by providing a scalable, replicable model that incorporates advanced data processing techniques and multidimensional data sources, supporting improved urban planning and policy-making while effectively delineating urban areas in varied settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.