ArticleScientific reports2025
A machine learning framework for predicting shear strength properties of rock materials.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction of soil shear strength using hybrid machine learning approaches for performance and interpretability analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The shear strength characteristics of rock materials, specifically internal friction angle and cohesion, are critical parameters for the design of rock structures. Accurate strength prediction can significantly reduce design time and costs while minimizing material waste associated with extensive physical testing. This paper utilizes experimental data from rock samples in the Himalayas to develop a novel machine learning model that combines the improved sparrow search algorithm (ISSA) with Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), referred to as the ISSA-XGBoost model, for predicting the shear strength characteristics of rock materials. To train and validate the proposed model, a dataset comprising 199 rock measurements and six input variables was employed. The ISSA-XGBoost model was benchmarked against other models, and feature importance analysis was conducted. The results demonstrate that the ISSA-XGBoost model outperforms the alternatives in both training and test datasets, showcasing superior predictive accuracy (R² = 0.982 for cohesion and R² = 0.932 for internal friction angle). Feature importance analysis revealed that uniaxial compressive strength has the greatest influence on cohesion, followed by P-wave velocity, while density exerts the most significant impact on internal friction angle, also followed by P-wave velocity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.