Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40082523›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Probiotic Bifidobacterium bifidum strains desialylate MUC13 and increase intestinal epithelial barrier function.

Celia Segui-Perez, Liane Z X Huang, Fernanda L Paganelli, Elke Lievens, Karin Strijbis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Gut microbes · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Metabolic interactions and growth dynamics ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Celia Segui-PerezDepartment of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Division Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Liane Z X HuangDepartment of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Division Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Fernanda L PaganelliWinclove Probiotics B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elke LievensWinclove Probiotics B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Karin StrijbisDepartment of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Division Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. K.Strijbis@uu.nl.

Funding

European Research Council ERC-2019-STG 852452Winclove Probiotics B.V. UU-KS-CSP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotic bacteria including Bifidobacterial species have the capacity to improve intestinal health, but the underlying molecular mechanisms are often not understood. Bifidobacteria are considered keystone species but have a relatively low abundance in the adult intestinal tract. Bifidobacterium colonization depends on degradation of host-derived carbohydrates, including human milk oligosaccharides and mucin-associated oligosaccharides. Specific Bifidobacterium strains can enhance intestinal barrier integrity and improve symptoms of gastrointestinal disorders. We previously reported that the transmembrane mucin MUC13 localizes to the apical and lateral membrane and regulates epithelial tight junction strength. Here, we screened probiotic bacterial strains for their capacity to modulate MUC13 and enhance intestinal barrier function. Of these probiotic bacteria, a Bifidobacterium bifidum strain uniquely degraded the MUC13 O-glycosylated extracellular domain. Further characterization of two probiotic B. bifidum strains (W23 and W28) and the type strain 20456 demonstrated that the W23 and W28 strains adhered strongly to the apical surface, had high sialidase activity, penetrated the mucus layer, and enhanced epithelial barrier integrity. These results underscore the strain-specific properties of these specific B. bifidum strains that most likely contribute to their probiotic effects in the intestinal tract.

Indexed as

Bifidobacterium bifidumIntestinal MucosaProbioticsCaco-2 CellsEpithelial CellsGlycosylationHumansNeuraminidaseTight JunctionsNeuraminidaseBifidobacterium bifidumIntestinal barrier functionLactiplantibacillus plantarumLactobacillus plantarumMUC13NeuraminidaseProbioticsSialic acidsSoluble mucus layerTight junctions

Identifiers

PMID40082523
PMCPMC11906825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.