ArticleScientific reports2025
Accurate lithofacies identification in deep shale gas reservoirs via an optimized neural network recognition model, Qiongzhusi Formation, southern Sichuan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anisotropic velocity properties and lithofacies identification of shahejie lacustrine shales.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation is crucial for exploring deep shale gas in Sichuan, however, challenges in accurately classifying shale lithofacies have hindered its commercialization. To address this, the deep shale reservoirs of the Qiongzhusi Formation were categorized into five lithofacies, five microfacies, and two-sedimentary models utilizing thin sections, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and petrophysical parameters. Subsequently, various lithofacies identification methods for deep shale gas reservoirs were developed. The recognition performance of triangle and three-dimensional spatial distribution chart methods is poor. The recognition effects of neural network clustering analysis (the testing and validation datasets) are less than 80%, and the training dataset is only 82.6%. On the basis of the trigonometric features, three-dimensional spatial distribution features, and neural network clustering features of the dataset, an optimized neural network lithofacies recognition model was developed. The recognition accuracy of the testing, validation, and training datasets of the ONN model based on the DL principle yielded is greater than 80%. The model achieves a recognition accuracy (training dataset) of 89.9%, with an 85% accuracy rate for blind well lithofacies recognition. This model offers valuable guidance for the exploration and development of deep shale gas in the research area, providing a substantial reference for lithofacies identification in deep shale gas reservoirs of other regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.