Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40082501›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep learning based agricultural pest monitoring and classification.

Stella Mary Venkateswara, Jayashree Padmanabhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stella Mary VenkateswaraDepartment of Computer Technology, MIT, Anna University, Chennai, India. stellamaryvenkateswara@gmail.com.
Jayashree PadmanabhanDepartment of Computer Technology, MIT, Anna University, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise pest classification plays an essential role in smart agriculture. Crop yields are severely impacted by pest damage, which poses a critical challenge for agricultural production and the economy. Identifying pests is of utmost importance, but manual identification is both labor-intensive and time-consuming. Therefore, the realm of pest identification and classification requires more advanced and effective techniques. The proposed work presents an innovative automatic approach based on the incorporation of deep learning in smart farming for pest monitoring and classification to tackle this challenge. In this work, the IP102 dataset is used to identify and classify 82 classes of pests. Autoencoder is utilized to address data imbalance issue by generating augmented images. RedGreenBlue colour code and object detection techniques are employed to localize and segment pests from the field images. Finally, these segmented pests are classified using Convolutional neural networks. The Average Intersection of Union (IoU) of object detection used for pest segmentation is 80%. The proposed classification model achieved an accuracy of 84.95% with the balanced dataset, outperforming the existing model. Identifying the count of pests in the image helps in determining the extent of pest damage. The results showcase the potential of this approach to revolutionize traditional pest monitoring methods, offering a more proactive and precise strategy for pest control in agricultural settings. This research work contributes to the advancement of smart farming practices through intelligent pest classification for pest control.

Indexed as

AgricultureCrops, AgriculturalDeep LearningPest ControlImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerAutoencoderClassificationConvolutional neural networkData augmentationPest monitoringSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID40082501
PMCPMC11906626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.