ArticleScientific reports2025
Three-dimensional markerless surface topography approach with convolutional neural networks for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis screening.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- State-of-the-art review in AI and digital technologies for spine deformity.Spine deformity · 2026Review
- From Algorithms to Clinics: Recent Progress in AI for Scoliosis Diagnosis and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Three-Dimensional Surface Topography for the Assessment of Spinal Alignment: A Cross-Sectional Study of Biomechanical Correlates.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advanced machine learning model for Cobb angle progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with surface topography: a multicenter, prospective, observational study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- 3D topographic acquisitions to predict spinal curvature in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : a prospective validation study.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- A Modified Dot-Pattern Moiré Fringe Topography Technique for Efficient Human Body Surface Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prevalence and factors associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Shanghai, China: an artificial intelligence-assisted screening approach.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Automated CT dataset generation as a novel concept for verification of backshape-to-spine approach and Cobb Angle Estimation.PloS one · 2026Article
- Clinical Failure of General-Purpose AI in Photographic Scoliosis Assessment: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Wearable Devices in Scoliosis Treatment: A Scoping Review of Innovations and Challenges.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Clinical and Topographic Screening for Scoliosis in Children Participating in Routine Sports: A Prevalence and Accuracy Study in a Spanish Population.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional lateral and torsional deformity of the spine, affecting up to 5% of the population. Traditional scoliosis screening methods exhibit limited accuracy, leading to unnecessary referrals and exposure to ionizing radiation from x-ray examinations. The 3D markerless surface topography (ST) technique quantifies trunk asymmetry and can be a potential scoliosis screening tool. However, differences in trunk asymmetry between individuals with scoliosis and those with a typically developing spine have yet to be thoroughly studied. Using the ST method, this study aims to distinguish adolescents with AIS from those with typically a developing spine. Participants aged 10 to 18 years, comprising of 285 individuals with confirmed AIS and 273 with typically developing spines, were included in the study (total scans including follow-ups: 693 for the AIS group and 298 for the control group). The positive for AIS group was identified through radiographic exams, specifically with curves ranging from 10° to 45°, while the negative (control) group qualified if their scoliometer test measured less than 7° and they had no known scoliosis diagnosis. The dataset comprised of surface torso scans captured either using stationary Minolta cameras or with the Structure sensor. ST analysis involved the reflection of the 3D geometry of the torso, aligning it with the original torso by minimizing the distance between corresponding points. Deviations between the original and reflected torso over the back surface and torso surface depth were mapped onto 102 × 102 grids. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was developed using deviations and depth (distance between the back surface and frontal plane) maps as inputs to classify the torso surface of typically developing adolescents and those with AIS. 10-fold cross-validation was applied during model development. 20% of the data was used as a holdout for final testing. Classification results of the proposed model were compared to the ground truth. The average training and validation accuracy across the ten folds was 100% and 94%, respectively. The classifications from the testing sets using the best performing model from the 10-fold cross-validation obtained accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 95%, 97%, and 90%, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of the testing set was 9.7. Likewise, a negative likelihood ratio (NLR) of 0.032 was also attained. The model sensitivity for detecting curves with Cobb greater than 25° was 99%. The sensitivity for detecting mild cases (Cobb < 25°) was 96%. The proposed CNN predictive model to detect AIS using ST showed excellent classification results. Markerless surface topography can serve as a dependable and non-invasive method for screening AIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.