ArticleScientific reports2025
Comprehensive study of the microplastic footprint in the urban pond and river of Eastern India.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Co-Contamination and Combined Effects of Microplastic and Microbial Load on Water Quality and Public Health Risks in Industrial and Urban Canals of Coastal Bangladesh.Environmental health insights · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Freshwater ecosystems, comprising lakes, ponds, rivers, and groundwater, provides essential resources that support life on Earth. Though, during last few decades, the increasing concentrations of microplastics (MPs) in freshwater ecosystems are becoming a serious environmental concern with far-reaching and unpredictable consequences for human health and aquatic life. This study aimed to quantify and assess the dynamic footprint of MPs in the urban river and pond with their potential risks. The quantitative analyses revealed the presence of MPs in surface water and sediment of study sites between the range of 59-100 particles/l and 167-193 particles/g, respectively. According to the size distribution, 56.98% of the MPs were between 300 and 1180 μm, and 43.02% were between 1180 and 5000 μm. Further polymer characterization confirmed the presence of nylon (36%) as the dominant type, followed by polyethylene (25%), polyethylene terephthalate (18%), polyvinyl chloride (9%), polyurethane (5%), polypropylene (5%), and polystyrene (2%) in the available MPs. The film (39.07%) shaped MPs were dominant throughout the samples, followed by fragments (22.2%), particles (12.63%), fibre (9.73%), pellets (9.3%), foam (1.7%), and others. Following the risk analyses, the polymer hazard index and polymer load index values were above the crisis level (V and IV level), and potential ecological risk index for river water and pond surface water were extremely danger and danger levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.