ArticleScientific reports2025
Rice leaf disease classification using a fusion vision approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- In-vitro evaluation of selected nativeFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- IoT-RiceMobileNet: An improved lightweight MobileNetV2 Model for real-time multi-class rice disease detection using IoT.PloS one · 2026Article
- Rice seedling age detection under field conditions using M-Lresnet50 with image and environmental data.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Multi-omics analyses reveal the virulence differentiation underlying natural variation inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- A lightweight and generalizable deep learning framework for early detection of rice leaf diseases in complex field environments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Real-time jute leaf disease classification using an explainable lightweight CNN via a supervised and semi-supervised self-training approach.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rice serves as a fundamental staple for a significant portion of the global population, playing an essential role in ensuring food security worldwide. However, the continuous threat of various diseases risks both yield and quality. Detecting these diseases at an early stage is very important for effective management of these risks. This research introduces a novel approach for rice disease detection using the fusion vision boosted classifier (FVBC), integrating VGG19 for feature extraction and LightGBM for classification. The meticulously curated dataset comprises 2627 rice leaf images, categorized into training, validation, and test sets for robust model evaluation. The FVBC model achieves impressive accuracies of 97.78% on the training set, 97.5% on the validation set, and 97.6% on the test set, demonstrating its efficacy in disease detection. The model's performance compared with other classifiers, including Softmax, highlights its superiority. Hyperparameter tuning, such as learning rate and tree depth for LightGBM, was crucial for optimizing model performance. The proposed FVBC model offers a non-invasive, scalable solution for early disease detection, empowering farmers to implement timely interventions and enhance agricultural productivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.