ArticleScientific data2025
Dual Radar: A Multi-modal Dataset with Dual 4D Radar for Autononous Driving.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRFusion: a novel LiDAR-camera fusion network for BEV map construction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- S2R-Bench: A Sim-to-Real Evaluation Benchmark for Autonomous Driving.Scientific data · 2025Article
- A Survey of Deep Learning-Based 3D Object Detection Methods for Autonomous Driving Across Different Sensor Modalities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Vehicles detection through wireless sensors networks and optical fiber sensors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Vehicle Re-Identification Method Based on Efficient Self-Attention CNN-Transformer and Multi-Task Learning Optimization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Dense object detection methods in RAW UAV imagery based on YOLOv8.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
4D radar has higher point cloud density and precise vertical resolution than conventional 3D radar, making it promising for adverse scenarios in the environmental perception of autonomous driving. However, 4D radar is more noisy than LiDAR and requires different filtering strategies that affect the point cloud density and noise level. Comparative analyses of different point cloud densities and noise levels are still lacking, mainly because the available datasets use only one type of 4D radar, making it difficult to compare different 4D radars in the same scenario. We introduce a novel large-scale multi-modal dataset that captures both types of 4D radar, consisting of 151 sequences, most of which are 20 seconds long and contain 10,007 synchronized and annotated frames. Our dataset captures a variety of challenging driving scenarios, including multiple road conditions, weather conditions, different lighting intensities and periods. It supports 3D object detection and tracking as well as multi-modal tasks. We experimentally validate the dataset, providing valuable insights for studying different types of 4D radar.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.