ArticleScientific reports2025
Effects of racemic anisodamine in combination with orthokeratology and defocus incorporated multiple segment spectacle lenses for myopia control in adolescents.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Which is better for myopia control in children: orthokeratology or DIMS spectacle lenses? A meta-analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Current Evidence on Options and Efficacy of Combination Therapy for Myopia Control-A Narrative Review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical application of different myopia correction methods in the prevention and control of myopia in adolescents. A total of 145 myopic adolescents aged 8 to 15 years were included, and their eyes were divided into four groups based on the treatment modality: wearing Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments (DIMS) spectacle lenses alone (Group A), orthokeratology (OK) lenses alone (Group B), DIMS spectacle lenses combined with racemic anisodamine eye drops (Group C), and OK lenses combined with racemic anisodamine eye drops (Group D). The primary outcomes, including axial length and refractive error (expressed as spherical equivalent refraction, SER), were measured at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up. The clinical effects of each group were compared. The results showed significant differences in myopia progression across the groups, with Group D showing the least axial elongation. OK lenses were more effective than DIMS spectacle lenses in controlling myopia progression, and the combination of racemic anisodamine eye drops further enhanced the correction effect. This study provides important clinical evidence for myopia control interventions in adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.