Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40082423›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Groundwater quality evolution across China.

Qing Zhou, Jiangjiang Zhang, Shuyou Zhang, Qiang Chen, Huifeng Fan, Chenglong Cao, Yanni Zhang, Yadi Yang, Jian Luo, Yijun Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Groundwater quality evolution across China.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qing Zhou *Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1605-6493
Jiangjiang Zhang *Yangtze Institute for Conservation and Development, Hohai University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0513-5233
Shuyou Zhang *Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China.
Qiang ChenInstitute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China.
Huifeng FanXuchang Meteorological Service, Xuchang, China.
Chenglong CaoYangtze Institute for Conservation and Development, Hohai University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-2920-5330
Yanni ZhangInstitute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China.
Yadi YangInstitute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China.
Jian LuoSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA. jian.luo@ce.gatech.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7202-996X
Yijun YaoInstitute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China. yijun_yao@issas.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5827-8716

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 42077140Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation) BK20231461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

China is facing a severe groundwater quality crisis amid economic development and climate change, yet the extent and trajectory of this crisis remain largely unknown. Here we developed a machine-learning model, incorporating natural and social-economic factors, to construct annual probabilistic maps of poor groundwater quality (PGQ, i.e., Class V based on the Chinese groundwater quality standard) across China from 1980 to 2100. Alarmingly, our findings indicate a concerning escalation in PGQ area ratio, rising from 17.3% in 1980 to 30.1% in 2000, and surging to 40.8% by 2020, adversely affecting 6.8%, 17.5%, and 36.0% of the Chinese population, respectively. The predominant drivers of this degradation were identified as agricultural discharge (contributing to 10.7% growth in PGQ area ratio), followed by groundwater exploitation (5.6%), industrial discharge (5.3%), domestic discharge (1.7%), climate change (0.5%), and land use change (-0.3%). By 2050, the PGQ area ratio could range from 37.9% to 48.3% under different socio-economic and climate scenarios. Our study highlights the urgent need for effective water resources management and conservation measures to mitigate the deteriorating trend of groundwater quality and address the challenges posed by socio-economic development and climate change, thereby safeguarding water security for China and the global community.

Identifiers

PMID40082423
PMCPMC11906735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.