ArticleGlobal health promotion2025
Let them eat (birthday) cake: reframing healthy eating in healthcare organizations.
Article in Global health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Policy Analysis of Healthcare Healthy Eating Policies in Canada.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Review
- Peas in a Pod: The Process of Mutual Learning in Knowledge Exchange on Health Promotion Interventions Research.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthy eating is influenced by a myriad factors ranging from individual to societal. Healthcare organizations have recently adopted healthy eating policies to improve food environments; however, how such policies shape practice is still unknown. This qualitative study explores perspectives on continuous quality improvement (CQI) among healthcare staff and managers working in hospital foodservices post-implementation of a healthy eating policy aimed at improving food environments. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 foodservices staff at Nova Scotia Health. Participants varied in role (administrative, point-of-sale) and location (rural/urban). We analyzed findings using directed content analysis. Participants' approach to quality revealed a range of definitions of healthy eating, from health promotion efforts directed towards individual behavior change management to a broader emphasis on supportive food environments. This research also highlighted the complexity of the healthcare food environment in which health promotion was being implemented, a 'setting' as per the 'settings approach' to health promotion, but also revealing a 'setting within a setting': food environments within healthcare environments. These nested environments are alternatively more business or healthcare service-centric, within the larger healthcare environment. Healthcare practitioners' views on effective implementation of the policy also spanned many scales of healthy eating, informed by concepts within their core healthcare practice (dietetics: nutrients), the organization (historical nutrition contexts) and broader food culture (food trends and choice). This study has demonstrated that CQI for a healthier food environment within healthcare needs a broader focus to advance benchmarks for health promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.