ArticleCommunity dentistry and oral epidemiology2025
Change in Dental Visits Among Eligible Children Under the Impact of the Child Dental Benefits Schedule in Australia.
Article in Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesIn Australia, although there have been some improvements, child oral health continues to be a major public health issue. The Australian Government introduced the means-tested Child Dental Benefits Schedule (CDBS) in 2014 to support access to dental services for children and adolescents aged 0-17 years from low-income families. There is a lack of evidence documenting whether the CDBS improved the dental attendance rate. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the CDBS on dental visits among eligible children and adolescents in Australia.
methodsThe study analysed the data set from the birth cohort (B cohort) in the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC). This is a nationally representative cohort survey collected biennially since 2004. The information on dental visits in the last 12 months was reported by the parents. A difference-in-differences analysis was used to examine 22,985 observations in the period 2008-2018. A propensity score matching (PSM) method was employed as a robustness check for the main findings.
resultsThe proportion of children and adolescents eligible for CDBS in the six biennial surveys from 2008 to 2018 was 62.0%, 54.4%, 47%, 41.2%, 35.5%, and 28.9%, while the proportion of eligible individuals visiting dentists was 38.0%, 45.6%, 53.0%, 58.8%, 64.5%, and 71.1%, respectively. The analyses showed that the CDBS policy had a statistically significant and positive impact on dental visits among eligible children and adolescents. There was a 6.1-6.4 percentage point increase (p-value < 0.001) in dental visits across different specifications after the introduction of the CDBS policy.
conclusionThe removal of financial barriers was beneficial to improve dental visits; however, the target group still faces the other remaining barriers, especially those related to inequalities in the social determinants of health, impeding the uptake of free dental services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.