ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025
Combined Rigid-Flexible Multibody Analysis Reveals Reduced Pedicle Screw Loads in Short-Segment Fixation for Decompressed Lumbar Spine Stabilization.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative biomechanical analysis of pedicle screws versus cortical bone trajectory fixation in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpinal cord compression in patients with vertebral metastases often requires surgical decompression with spinal fixation. Recent studies reported increased implant failures due to mechanical complications, raising concerns about current clinical practices. Long-segment fixation (Lf) is commonly employed to enhance mechanical stability and reduce the severity of pedicle screw failure. The study investigates how the number of vertebral levels involved in fixation affects the loads on pedicle screw anchorages in a fatigue-related displacement domain.
methodUsing a rigid-flexible multibody approach, a non-linear T12-S1 model was employed to simulate two fixation types following L3 posterior decompression surgery: Lf spanning two levels above and below the decompression site (L1, L2, L4, and L5) and a short-segment fixation (Sf) involving only adjacent vertebrae. Internal reactions at the rod-pedicle screw anchorages were estimated in terms of pullout, shear forces, and bending moments. The range of motion analysed (flexion: 22°, extension: 8°, lateral bending: 12°, axial rotation: 5°) was confined to the "Cone of Economy", representing a small-displacement volume where loads are assumed cyclically exchanged.
resultsLf exhibited up to fivefold higher reactions than Sf, with a heterogeneous shear force distribution: middle screws appeared shielded, while extremity screws were overloaded (~400 N, comparable to experimental fatigue strength). Pullout forces remained within safe limits (< 150 N).
conclusionsThe rigid-flexible multibody approach effectively estimated internal loads in the implant-spine constructs under dynamic conditions. The findings highlight the long-term implications of Lf, demonstrating that involving more vertebral levels triggers adverse loads on pedicle screws, potentially compromising implant durability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.