Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40082300›Full record

ReviewInternational orthopaedics2025

Dark side of the shoulder: suprascapular and axillary nerve compressions.

Gokhan Ayik, Ulas Can Kolac, Mehmet Kaymakoglu, Edward McFarland, Gazi Huri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gokhan AyikYuksek Ihtisas Universitesi, Ankara, Turkey.
Ulas Can KolacHacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Mehmet KaymakogluIzmir University of Economics, Izmir, Turkey.
Edward McFarlandJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Gazi HuriHacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. ghuri@aspetar.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe suprascapular and axillary nerves can be subject to entrapment due to both their anatomical courses and their anatomical relationships with surrounding anatomical structures around shoulder. These entrapments were previously considered as a diagnosis of exclusion. However, today these pathologies can be diagnosed as primary. The most common complaints of patients are pain and sometimes weakness. The clinician's suspicion is very important in making diagnosis. The patient's history, duration of symptoms, and information such as the movements in which the complaints increase should be questioned carefully and in detail. In physical examination, symmetrical evaluation of both shoulders can provide important information. In addition, cervical and brachial plexus pathologies should be kept in mind. According to the suprascapular and axillary nerve innervations, muscle atrophy should be evaluated during inspection. Range of motion and neurological examination around shoulder should be performed. Since these entrapments can be seen together with rotator cuff tears and labrum pathologies etc., these additional pathologies should also be targeted during evaluation. The evaluation should be expanded with imaging methods such as plain radiographs, ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, electrodiagnostic studies and local anaesthetic injections to the entrapment area. There is no definitive method to diagnose these pathologies. As a result of all these evaluations, a diagnosis can be made. There is no consensus on treatment. In isolated entrapment cases where there are no additional surgical pathologies such as space-occupying lesions, non-operative treatment is primarily recommended. It is generally recommended to try non-operative treatment for at least six months. Surgical treatment is recommended in cases where non-operative treatment fails or in cases where there are additional pathologies requiring surgery or in cases where there is extrinsic compression such as sapce-occupying lesions. In the decision and choice of surgical treatment, it is very important to determine the aetiology precisely. Surgical treatment can be performed open and arthroscopically. Various additional arthroscopic portals and techniques have been described. However, there is no clear consensus on the superiority of these treatments over each other. Although physical therapy is recommended after surgical treatment, there is no consensus on this issue in the literature.

aimThis review aims to summarize the diagnosis and management of suprascapular and axillary nerve entrapments in athletes, focusing on clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, treatment options, and current controversies.

Indexed as

AxillaNerve Compression SyndromesShoulderHumansPhysical ExaminationRange of Motion, ArticularShoulder PainAxillary nerve entrapmentMuscle atrophyNerveShoulderSuprascapular nerve entrapmentWeakness

Identifiers

PMID40082300
PMCPMC12003475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.