Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40082271›Full record

ReviewTransgenic research2025

Genome editing research initiatives and regulatory landscape of genome edited crops in India.

Neha Sharma, Kanika Thakur, Rasna Zinta, Vikas Mangal, Dalamu, Jagesh Kumar Tiwari, Salej Sood, Som Dutt, Vinod Kumar, Brajesh Singh and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Transgenic research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Advances in mutant characterization for detecting causal mutations in crop plants.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. CRISPR/Cas system-mediated transgene-free or DNA-free genome editing in plants.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  8. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated editing ofFrontiers in genome editing · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Neha SharmaICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, HP, 171 001, India.
Kanika ThakurICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, HP, 171 001, India.
Rasna ZintaICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, HP, 171 001, India.
Vikas MangalICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, HP, 171 001, India.
DalamuICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, HP, 171 001, India.
Jagesh Kumar TiwariICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi, UP, 221 305, India.
Salej SoodICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, HP, 171 001, India.
Som DuttICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, HP, 171 001, India.
Vinod KumarICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, HP, 171 001, India.
Brajesh SinghICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, HP, 171 001, India.
Ajay Kumar ThakurICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, HP, 171 001, India. thakurak2010@gmail.com.

Funding

Indian Council of Agricultural Research ICAR-Genome Editing Project, Cabin Project, AINP on Biotech Crops
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food and nutritional security are the top priorities in Indian agriculture. Exponential population growth coupled with climate change effects has become a serious challenge for sustainable agriculture. Genome editing has revolutionized the agricultural sector because of its ability to create precise, stable and predictable modifications in the genome and therefore, offers great opportunities for crop improvement in India. However, for harvesting the real benefits of this technology in agriculture sector, there is a strong need of creating awareness among the end users and development of suitable policies for regularization of genome edited products. Many regulatory agencies around the world have been modernizing their regulatory approaches to be more risk proportionate and to reflect a more science-based approach. In this article, recent research initiatives and developments undertaken by different Indian institutes/organizations for the genetic improvement of agricultural and horticultural crops via genome editing technologies are summarized. Furthermore, to benefit from this potential technology in our country, regulatory policies must be clear, science-based and proportionate. Therefore, in the present review, the regulatory policies related to the genome editing of crop products in India are discussed in detail. This review will sensitize researchers and stakeholders to the application of genome editing techniques in crop improvement and various biosafety committees involved in the development and regulation of genome edited crops.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalGene EditingGenome, PlantPlants, Genetically ModifiedAgricultureCRISPR-Cas SystemsHumansIndiaAgricultural cropsBiosafetyGenome editingHorticultural cropsIndiaRegulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.