Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40082076›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2025

Raising the Topic: Clinical Needs Assessment and Co-Design of Targeted Clinical Resources for Primary Healthcare Practitioners to Prevent and Manage Childhood Obesity.

Oliver J Canfell, Jacqueline Cotugno, Joanna Munro, Leanna Woods, Robyn Littlewood, Jacqueline L Walker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Supporting Decision Making in Early Years Initiatives: Co-Designing a Child Health Evidence Dashboard.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Oliver J CanfellDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2010-3640
Jacqueline CotugnoHealth and Wellbeing Queensland, Queensland Government, the State of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6958-3662
Joanna MunroHealth and Wellbeing Queensland, Queensland Government, the State of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0546-3069
Leanna WoodsQueensland Digital Health Centre, Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, the University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4811-4608
Robyn LittlewoodHealth and Wellbeing Queensland, Queensland Government, the State of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9955-3662
Jacqueline L WalkerHealth and Wellbeing Queensland, Queensland Government, the State of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6325-453X

Funding

Health & Wellbeing Queensland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to (a) determine the unmet clinical resource needs of multidisciplinary primary healthcare practitioners (PHPs) to overcome evidence-based barriers to preventing and managing childhood obesity in practice; and (b) co-design precision solutions to the identified needs of PHPs.

methodsThis qualitative study was conducted across three phases: (1) clinical needs assessment with 18 multidisciplinary PHPs over five virtual focus groups, (2) participatory, user-centred co-design via an online design workshop with five PHPs and four caregivers, and (3) clinical resource prototype development and qualitative user feedback. Data was thematically analysed using the Framework Method.

resultsClinical needs assessment (phase 1) identified unmet resource needs across four themes: (a) visual and simple clinically integrated media; (b) positive, health-focused language and countering shame; (c) referral opportunities and clinical upskilling in priority areas; (d) practical family-based, culturally appropriate and early years focus. Co-design (phase 2) developed nine clinical resource solutions. A prototype was developed for clinical piloting that targets the pervasive barrier of initiating a conversation about weight and healthy growth-the BRAVE (Build relationships, Raise respectfully, Ask about attitudes, Validate values, Engage & enable) framework. The purpose of BRAVE is to improve PHP self-efficacy to raise the topic of weight and to provide a safe, trusted and empowering environment for children and families.

conclusionsThis study uncovered unmet clinical resource needs for PHPs to confidently address childhood obesity and co-designed a new clinical resource to help PHPs raise the topic of weight with families that is ready for clinical piloting.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelNeeds AssessmentPediatric ObesityPrimary Health CareAdultChildFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleQualitative Researchchildhood obesityco‐designhealthcare professionalspreventive medicineprimary health carerisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40082076
PMCPMC11906268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.