Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40082069›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of sport science2025

Comparison Between Shoulder Flexed and Extended Positions in Elbow Flexion Resistance Training on Regional Hypertrophy and Maximum Strength: Preacher versus Bayesian Cable Curls.

Parsa Attarieh, João Pedro Nunes, Saeed Khani, Saman Negahdar, Amirali Goli, Hamed Nazarirad, Shahriar Nazarirad, Shima Mojtahedi, Kazunori Nosaka, Rahman Soori

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Parsa AttariehDepartment of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
João Pedro NunesPhysical Education and Sport Center, Londrina State University, Londrina, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8144-5906
Saeed KhaniDepartment of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Saman NegahdarDepartment of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Amirali GoliDepartment of Biological Sciences in Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Hamed NazariradDepartment of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Shahriar NazariradDepartment of Physiology, Division of Sports Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Shima MojtahediDepartment of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Kazunori NosakaSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.
Rahman SooriDepartment of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, the effects of resistance training on regional hypertrophy and maximum strength of the elbow flexor muscles were compared between elbow flexion exercises performed with different shoulder joint angles (∼50° of flexion vs. extension) while matched for resistance profiles. In a within-subject design, 15 young men (25.6 ± 2.1 y; 77.3 ± 6.8 kg; 175.1 ± 5.7 cm) underwent a resistance training program twice a week for 10 weeks (3-5 sets, 8-12RM), and their arms were dominant-side balanced, randomly assigned to one of the two conditions according to elbow flexion exercises: unilateral cable curl with shoulder flexed (Preacher curl; PREA) or unilateral cable curl with shoulder extended (Bayesian curl; BAYE). B-mode ultrasound imaging was used to measure changes in muscle thickness of the biceps brachii and brachialis at proximal, mid, and distal arm regions, and one-repetition maximum tests were completed in each respective trained exercise before and after training. Both conditions showed significant increases in muscle thickness (p < 0.05) with no significant differences between them (p > 0.05) across the biceps brachii proximal, mid, and distal regions (relative change [Hedges' g effect size]; PREA: 6%[0.51], 7%[0.49], 7%[0.53]; BAYE: 9%[0.73], 9%[0.62], 9%[0.62]) and brachialis (PREA: 10%[0.72]; BAYE: 8%[0.65]). Similarly, significant improvements in maximum strength were observed (p < 0.05), with equivalent results between conditions (PREA: 28%[0.85], BAYE: 37%[1.22]; equivalence testing, p-values = 0.061, 0.637). In conclusion, the shoulder joint angle does not seem to affect muscle hypertrophy and maximum strength gains after different elbow flexion exercises matched for resistance profiles.

Indexed as

ElbowElbow JointMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthResistance TrainingShoulder JointAdultHumansMaleRange of Motion, ArticularShoulderUltrasonographyYoung Adultexercise selectioninhomogeneous hypertrophymuscle architecturestrength training

Identifiers

PMID40082069
PMCPMC11906226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.