ArticleBMJ open2025
Optimal lumbar vertebral level for trunk muscle CT assessments in opportunistic sarcopenia screening: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fatty infiltration in paraspinal muscles in spine-specific sarcopenia.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026Review
- Association Between the Creatinine-to-Body Weight Ratio and All-Cause Mortality in a Rural Japanese Community.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to identify the optimal lumbar vertebral level for CT-based assessments of trunk muscles in relation to physical function and muscle strength, and to establish a foundation for opportunistic CT screening for sarcopenia.
designA cross-sectional study was conducted between April 2022 and December 2022. Pearson's correlation coefficients and multiple linear regression analyses were employed to estimate the correlation between CT parameters of trunk muscle with physical function and muscle strength. SETTING AND
participantsThe study included community residents aged 50 years and older from Kunming, Yunnan Province, China, who were part of the SOY (Sarcopenia and Osteoporosis Study of Yunnan) cohort. A total of 615 participants were enrolled, comprising 424 men and 191 women. Among these, 31 individuals (20 men and 11 women) were diagnosed with sarcopenia.
interventionsEach participant underwent lumbar CT scanning, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and handgrip strength (HGS) assessment. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: A correlation analysis was conducted for both the general and sarcopenia groups, after adjusting for age and body mass index. Additionally, a gender-stratified analysis was performed.
resultsMuscle density and muscle area at all levels exhibited a moderate correlation with grip strength, with the correlation for muscle area being more pronounced (correlation β of muscle density =0.48-0.54, p value <0.001; correlation β of muscle area=0.66-0.68, p value <0.001). However, only muscle density demonstrated a weak correlation in the correlation analysis with SPPB (correlation β of muscle density =0.09-0.12, p value <0.01). When stratified by gender, trunk muscle attenuation at the L1 vertebral level in the male group showed a more pronounced correlation with physical performance (L1-βHGS =0.25, p value <0.001 vs L2-L5-βHGS =0.16-0.19, p value =0.01-0.04; L1-βSPPB =0.31, p value <0.001 vs L2-L5-βSPPB =0.23-0.29, p value <0.01). In the female cohort, both the muscle area and muscle density at all levels showed correlations with grip strength, and the muscle area at L3 vertebrae showed the best performance (L3-βHGS =0.23, p value <0.001). In the sarcopenia group, the L1 level correlates better with HGS and SPPB than other levels. (L1-βHGS =0.54, p value =0.03 and L1-βSPPB =-0.35, p value =0.04).
conclusionsIn this study, the area and density of lumbar muscles based on CT showed correlations of varying degrees with grip strength or SPPB. The L1 layer exhibited superior performance in those aged more than 50 years, especially in the male and sarcopenia groups. This study suggests that CT-based muscle assessment at the L1 vertebra may be a feasible option for opportunistic sarcopenia screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR210005215; Pre-results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.