ArticleBMJ open2025
Approaches for thoracoabdominal oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a network meta-analysis - study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOesophageal cancer is the seventh most frequently diagnosed cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Oesophagectomy remains the main curative treatment option. The effect of different surgical approaches (completely open, hybrid, completely minimally invasive and robot-assisted) on patients undergoing thoracoabdominal oesophagectomy (Ivor-Lewis's procedure) for oesophageal cancer is evaluated, focusing on overall survival, postoperative mortality and morbidity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic literature search will be conducted in PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ClinicalTrials.gov and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform using predefined search terms. A random-effects (network) meta-analysis using the frequentist framework will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this study is based on previously published data, no ethical approval is required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations to inform clinical decision-makers (eg, surgeons, gastroenterologists). TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024564915.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.