ArticleBMJ open2025
Barriers to annual diabetic retinopathy screening and subsequent recommended follow-up adherence among Chinese diabetics: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAdherence to routine annual eye evaluations for diabetes is frequently insufficient on a global scale. We evaluated the adherence to annual diabetic retinopathy screening (DRS) and recommended follow-up among Chinese patients with diabetes, and we also identified the associated risk variables.
designThis was a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.
settingPatients with diabetes were inquired about their completion of DRS within the preceding year. All participants were required to complete the Compliance with Annual Diabetic Eye Exams Survey.
participantsParticipants with diabetes who initially sought eye examination from November 2021 to October 2023 at He Eye Specialist Hospital, Shenyang, China. OUTCOME MEASURES: Logistic regression analyses defined the risk factors associated with poor compliance with the annual DRS and recommended follow-up.
resultsThere were 468 patients registered, with a mean age of 67.42±10.66 years. A total of 308 (65.8%) participants had DRS in the previous year. Rural residents (OR 1.704, 95% CI 1.019 to 2.850, p=0.042), vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) (OR 1.948, 95% CI 1.145 to 3.313, p=0.014), item 7 (over the past 4 weeks, I have felt blue, downhearted or depressed) (OR 0.624, 95% CI 0.401 to 0.971, p=0.037) and item 42 (I receive a reminder from my eye doctor's office when it is time to schedule an exam) (OR 0.618, 95% CI 0.387 to 0.989, p=0.045) were associated with non-adherence to annual DRS. The compliance with DRS improved to 80.9% in the second year after health education and reminders of follow-up. VTDR (OR 3.063, 95% CI 1.852 to 5.066, p<0.01) was found to be the risk factor for poor compliance with scheduled follow-up.
conclusionsAbout one-third of diabetics did not complete annual DRS; that rate decreased to one-fifth after health education and follow-up reminders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.