Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40081994›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Social distancing and mental health two years into a global pandemic: a sequential exploratory mixed-methods investigation in Hong Kong.

Grace W K Ho, Sau Fong Leung, Yim Wah Mak, Kwan Ho Wong, Robin K H Kwok, Alice Yuen Loke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Grace W K HoSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China grace.wk.ho@polyu.edu.hk.
Sau Fong LeungSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Yim Wah MakSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7330-7001
Kwan Ho WongSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1393-7954
Robin K H KwokSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Alice Yuen LokeSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has led to the implementation of social distancing measures on an unprecedented scale, but their impacts on the mental health of the general public, especially in places with strict and prolonged restrictions, are not well understood. This study explored the Hong Kong public's views on social distancing measures that were implemented approximately two years into the pandemic and examined how these perceptions influence their stay-at-home motivation and mental health based on Protection Motivation Theory (PMT).

designA two-phase sequential exploratory mixed-methods study was conducted.

settingData were collected as part of a larger study of a universal online public health campaign in Hong Kong.

participantsFirst, qualitative interviews with 26 participants from diverse backgrounds explored their views on COVID-19 and social distancing measures. Subsequently, a quantitative online survey of 1025 participants from the general population examined the relationship between PMT constructs, stay-at-home motivation, and mental health. OUTCOME MEASURES: Mental health and PMT constructs, including protective motivation, perceived severity, perceived vulnerability, self-efficacy, response cost, and response efficacy.

resultsThe qualitative results identified three themes: 'the inescapable and unpredictable nature of COVID-19', 'stay-at-home impacts all facets of life', and 'the realities and challenges of social distancing during a pandemic'. Subsequently, quantitative findings showed that most PMT constructs, such as perceived severity (ß=0.21, 95% CI=0.15-0.27), perceived vulnerability (ß=0.24, 95% CI=0.18-0.30), self-efficacy (ß=0.27, 95% CI=0.20-0.34) and response efficacy (ß=0.09, 95% CI=0.02-0.15), were associated with stay-at-home motivation (all p<0.01), except for response cost. Higher perceived severity (ß=1.42-1.74), perceived vulnerability (ß=0.93-1.36), and response cost (ß=1.29-1.64) were associated with poorer mental health.

conclusionThis study examined the public perceptions and experiences of strict and prolonged social distancing measures two years into a global pandemic. The findings highlighted the significance of using the PMT model to understand the factors influencing stay-at-home intentions and their mental health during the pandemic. The findings provide valuable insights to guide the development and implementation of future public health interventions.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental HealthPhysical DistancingAdultAgedFemaleHong KongHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationPandemicsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2Self EfficacySurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19MENTAL HEALTHPublic health

Identifiers

PMID40081994
PMCPMC11907017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.