ArticleBMJ open2025
Value and service match of advanced training skills among rural general practitioners: a qualitative Australian study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enablers and barriers of General Practitioner's choice of additional skills training: a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdvanced skills training (AST) is a requirement for rural generalist training in Australia. This study explored the lived experience of general practitioners who have undertaken AST to better appreciate its value and fitness for purpose.
methodsThirteen participants were recruited via convenience sampling. A descriptive phenomenological study design was employed. Semistructured interviews were conducted and thematically analysed to identify patterns in the data.
resultsParticipants identified the professional value of AST, describing improved clinical competence, clinical courage, development of professional networks, work satisfaction and recognition. AST enabled better provision and continuity of care to rural communities. Potential service mismatches between AST specialty selection and perceived community needs are a current challenge.
conclusionRecommendations include refining the programme selection process, increasing programme flexibility and developing clearer guidelines to navigate training pathways. Future research should explore the value of AST from community perspectives to inform tailored approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.