ArticleMedical humanities2025
Negotiating uncertainties: care-seeking in an algorithmic society.
Article in Medical humanities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Using the advantages and avoiding the risks - a public survey about the challenges of online purchases of medicines.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article examines how different layers of health-related uncertainties emerge and intersect in an algorithmic society. We aim to understand how people's self-care practices co-evolve with digitalised health systems. Sweden stands out among Western countries due to the population's high digital consumption of medical and health products. We conceptualise health-related uncertainties as inherent in care-seeking. The uncertainties are embedded in an algorithmic society and hinge on what we term algorithmised medicine. Methods used are open-ended questionnaires and semistructured interviews with Swedish residents. We identify: First, people are aware of algorithm-embedded digital infrastructure and its impact on information access in everyday life. Second, people oscillate on a trust-distrust nexus in different contexts. And third, lived experiences of the body compete with medical advice and online information. We conclude that while formal health systems strive to be robust, access to medicines remains an uncertain practice at the interplay of medicine, algorithms and bodily experiences of sickness. This study contributes to the field of medical humanities by showing that the digital arena is a porous and emergent entity, with inseparable links to people's lived experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.